<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Installation of CentOS on a server with a SmartRAID V controller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linuxforfun.net/2008/03/04/smartraid-centos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linuxforfun.net/2008/03/04/smartraid-centos/</link>
	<description>Just for Fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://linuxforfun.net/2008/03/04/smartraid-centos/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxforfun.net/2008/03/04/installation-of-centos-51-on-an-old-machine-with-a-smartraid-v-controller/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>If you load both i2o_block and i2o_scsi, then the CentOS installer will see both /dev/i2o/hda and the individual /dev/sda and so on.

I found that by only using i2o_block, the individual scsi devices would remain obfuscated from the OS, preventing accidental damage to the RAID container.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you load both i2o_block and i2o_scsi, then the CentOS installer will see both /dev/i2o/hda and the individual /dev/sda and so on.</p>
<p>I found that by only using i2o_block, the individual scsi devices would remain obfuscated from the OS, preventing accidental damage to the RAID container.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
